Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
(The description in the Elisp manual, BTW, also explain what the
duplicate name does, although I'm not sure why it is done here,
because the names of the local functions should be unique already.
I'm probably overlooking something.)
Ok - I understand now that the names are used by Edebug internally, to
map the code pieces to a descriptor.
Then I guess the names must be unique here because shadowing local
functions would get the same name assigned. Or any that appear
anywhere, actually... right?