bug#65344: 28.2; Unable to Edebug cl-flet form which uses argument destructuring

[Gerd Möllmann]

Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

>> The root of this is the old discussion of how strictly cl-lib should
>> follow the Common Lisp originals.  We will not pacify this discussion.
>> I think we found a good compromise in most cases, even when it is not
>> the optimum for everyone.
>
> FWIW.
>
> Dunno which part(s) of the people I fall in, but my
> opinion is that we should have separated, and we
> still should try to separate (1) actual Common Lisp 
> emulation/reproduction/whatever-you-want-to-call-it,
> which should be quite faithful to the standard, from
> (2) non-CL constructs (functions, variables, macros,
> special forms) that might seem a bit CL-like or that
> might share some of the underlying implementation
> with some of #1.

Agree 100&, but that ship seems to have saild.