bug#62694: 30.0.50; eglot-tests fails with recent pylsp

[João Távora]

> The problem does exist, as Micheal has explained in so many words.
> Please trust him, as I do, that he knows what he is talking about, and
> would have solved this himself if an easier solution were possible.
>
> I see no significant complexity in adding a version test.  We do that
> in umpteen other places with many other programs.

It's not a version test. I've already done that for clangd, per Michael's
request.  Here, pylsp's Debian packaging seems just to be buggy.

Michael has previously found another buggy way to install clangd for
example, some method that created a 'clangd' script that didn't
even respond to `--version`.  Those things are very hard to check against
and it's just not worth it.

> > I don't understand what the problem with adding a 'pip install' line
> > to the EMBA scripts is.
>
> Again, please trust Michael on that one.  We will not make any
> progress if we start second-guessing every request and decision of our
> peers, especially after you already suggested the upgrade, and Michael
> already explained why he thought it wasn't the best alternative.

No he didn't.  He _didn't_ explain what bad thing would come to the
world if pip install was added to the EMBA scripts.

Alternatively, simply don't install any pylsp on EMBA.  Boom, also
problem solved. Eventually, I will rework those tests to not rely on
pylsp at all, and I'll use something else to test those parts of eglot.el

But spending time answering these mails doesn't make any progress in
that direction.

João