bug#62694: 30.0.50; eglot-tests fails with recent pylsp

[João Távora]

On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 12:17 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

>
> Well, how about coding the test Michael asked, and I seconded, then?
> I agree that it will be a much better use of our time than keeping
> arguing about it.
>
> TIA

Quoting myself:

> > Show me the code that does that "checking if up to the job" and show
> > me that it doesn't slow down Eglot tests significantly and I will
> > consider it.   I don't have Debian to test. It's not a trivial job
> >(at least I think so).  If it is trivial, then please help me.

> > I think it's a much better effort spent to convert those tests from
> > pylsp to clangd by the way.  So if you're goint to help me, you
> > could start with that.  Probably easier too.

Many TIAs