[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, def
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Feb 2023 10:05:58 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 01:06:02 +0000
> From: Randy Taylor <dev@rjt.dev>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, casouri@gmail.com, 61655@debbugs.gnu.org,
> jacob.fai@gmail.com, Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no>
>
> On Thursday, February 23rd, 2023 at 21:31, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure about the naming of font-lock-variable-ref-face. It's confusing
> for languages that support actual references like C++ and Rust.
That's a different kind of "reference".
> Maybe the opposite direction is better: font-lock-variable-def-face (or
> something similar) for definitions (or whatnot), and
> font-lock-variable-name-face to refer to uses (same goes for property).
No, that would rename a widely used face which we had for many years.
> Or font-lock-variable-use-face.
That could work, but then we'd need to change all the other "-ref-"
faces to "-use-" as well.
> Personally, I don't really see the value in differentiating these for
> variables. I can understand it a little more for properties. But I guess it
> doesn't hurt to add if folks want it.
Right, it doesn't hurt.
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, (continued)
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/23
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Randy Taylor, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Randy Taylor, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/25
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/27
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately,
Eli Zaretskii <=