bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately

[Theodor Thornhill]

Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:

> On 24/02/2023 09:56, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> The important question here, I think, is whether we want to split
>>> font-lock-property-faces in two, like I did here.
>> What harm can it do, if done like you did, i.e. the faces are
>> indistinguishable by default?
>
> Not much. We do rename the face this late into the pretest, though.
>
> And if not many modes use it, then it could not be worth it. OTOH, modes 
> sometimes need additional faces, to use for their unique syntactic 
> elements. So more faces could be a good idea, just from that perspective.
>
> So if nobody has objections, I'll install the patch later today.

No objections from me :)