[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:53:05 +0200 |
> From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 12:17:54 +0000
> Cc: tino.calancha@gmail.com, 25154@debbugs.gnu.org, agrambot@gmail.com
>
> I agree, patches to that effect are welcome. (AFAICT, the manual
> tries to say that already, but the wording could be more explicit.)
>
> OK, I've attached a patch that hopefully clarifies this a bit.
Thanks. My only comment is that I think we prefer talking about
"binding" instead of "assignment".
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Alex, 2016/12/09
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Alex, 2016/12/09
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Tino Calancha, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Philipp Stephani, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Tino Calancha, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Philipp Stephani, 2016/12/23
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Tino Calancha, 2016/12/23
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Philipp Stephani, 2016/12/23
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Alex, 2016/12/10
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/10
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Alex, 2016/12/10
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Tino Calancha, 2016/12/10