[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Dec 2016 09:22:15 +0200 |
> From: Alex <agrambot@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 17:36:15 -0600
>
> Compare the following:
>
> (let ((x 5)
> (x 6))
> (+ x 10))
>
> => 16
>
> (cl-letf ((x 5)
> (x 6))
> (+ x 10))
>
> => 15
Isn't it true that the order of evaluation in a 'let' is unspecified?
If you want a particular order, use 'let*'.
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Alex, 2016/12/09
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Alex, 2016/12/09
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Tino Calancha, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Philipp Stephani, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Tino Calancha, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Philipp Stephani, 2016/12/23
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Tino Calancha, 2016/12/23
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/23
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Philipp Stephani, 2016/12/23
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Alex, 2016/12/10