[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:09:45 +0200 |
> From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:41:16 +0000
> Cc: 25154@debbugs.gnu.org, Alex <agrambot@gmail.com>
>
> > Isn't it true that the order of evaluation in a 'let' is unspecified?
> > If you want a particular order, use 'let*'.
> Right, the order of evaluation in a let is up to the implementation. A
> program
> should not rely on such details.
> The same statement should apply to cl-letf.
>
> I think that should be mentioned explicitly in the manuals: given that the
> order of value evaluations is specified,
> people might expect the same for the bindings themselves.
I agree, patches to that effect are welcome. (AFAICT, the manual
tries to say that already, but the wording could be more explicit.)
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Alex, 2016/12/09
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Alex, 2016/12/09
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Tino Calancha, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Philipp Stephani, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Tino Calancha, 2016/12/10
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Philipp Stephani, 2016/12/23
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Tino Calancha, 2016/12/23
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/23
- bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Philipp Stephani, 2016/12/23
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Alex, 2016/12/10
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/10
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Alex, 2016/12/10
bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order, Tino Calancha, 2016/12/10