[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Therion] Why no rock point symbol?
From: |
Wookey |
Subject: |
Re: [Therion] Why no rock point symbol? |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:36:44 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On 2006-12-22 09:50 +0100, Stacho Mudrak wrote:
> Quoting Wookey <address@hidden>:
> > There are point symbols for blocks and peddles and debris and roots
> > and all sorts of things but not 'a rock' which would be a really
> > well-used one if it existed...
>
> There is no problem to add one. Just to be sure - what is the
> difference between block and rock?
Erm, none, for this purpose.
In english caving terminology a 'block' is a large rock, at least 1m
in some dimension, and sometimes more than 10m. A rock is any rock
down to hand size, as well as the bedrock itself. 'Boulder' is rocks
bigger than 0.5m diameter, and tends to imply a relatively round
shape. This probably varies a bit with regions (I tend to use 'rock'
for all rocks no matter what size or shape, adding 'huge', 'big',
'house-sized', 'dodgy' as required. I might use 'block' if it was very
square, but rarely).
> > Is there a good reason why we don't have this?
>
> There is no reason. There are still some symbols missing - for
> example, I am missing symbol for stalactites. We have a symbol for
> single stalactite, but if there are many small ones, we have no symbol
> for that also.
And I still owe you a drawing of a calcite area for designing a symbol.
Wookey
--
Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679
work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://wookware.org/
_______________________________________________
Therion mailing list
address@hidden
http://www.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion