[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @code vs. @t for node names
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: @code vs. @t for node names |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:40:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 06:04:35PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
>
> But now I'm wondering if it would be better to use @t than @code. Then
> there wouldn't be the 'quotes' in the node name, which seem like they
> just get in the way.
>
> (As far as I know all of the usual markup commands generate 'quotes'.)
>
> Using @t will mean the output in TeX/HTML will still correctly use the
> typewriter font, which was one of the main reasons I wanted to do this.
>
>
> But before I switch everything again, I thought I'd ask ... any problems
> with @t for this come to mind? Better alternatives? ?
No, I don't see any problem, nor do I see better alternatives. In the
code, I had to use a pseudo type to have the code style (that is `` is
still `` and not ") as there was no @-command that didn't add the
quotes.
--
Pat