@code vs. @t for node names

[Karl Berry]

Hmm.  I've been converting all the Texinfo manual node names to use
@-commands, as in

  @node @code{makeinfo} Pointer Creation

This generates:

  File: texinfo,  Node: 'makeinfo' Pointer Creation,  Next: '@anchor',  Prev: 
'@node',  Up: Nodes

  6.2 'makeinfo' Pointer Creation
  ===============================

But now I'm wondering if it would be better to use @t than @code.  Then
there wouldn't be the 'quotes' in the node name, which seem like they
just get in the way.  As in:

  @node @t{makeinfo} Pointer Creation
generating
  File: texinfo,  Node: makeinfo Pointer Creation,  Next: @anchor,  Prev: 
@node,  Up: Nodes
  
(As far as I know all of the usual markup commands generate 'quotes'.)

Using @t will mean the output in TeX/HTML will still correctly use the
typewriter font, which was one of the main reasons I wanted to do this.


But before I switch everything again, I thought I'd ask ... any problems
with @t for this come to mind?  Better alternatives?  ?

Thanks,
k