[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scope of recusrsive @syn*index
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: scope of recusrsive @syn*index |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:20:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 05:08:28PM -0700, Karl Berry wrote:
> Should funcsconcepts entries be formatted s code or not? This is the
> case right now, but my first guess would be that it is incorrect.
>
> I also think it should be roman, because of the
> @synindex funcsconcepts funcs
Ok.
> (This is another case where it seems to me the Texinfo language got
> unnecessarily complicated. It would be tons simpler to understand if
> the font used for entries in a given index was defined by the
> @def[code]index once and for all, and @synindex simply combined indexes
> without affecting fonts, and so @syncodeindex would be unnecessary. I
> suspect someone couldn't be bothered to implement (or maybe think about)
> the right thing umpteen years ago, and now we're stuck with supporting
> it. Sigh. Anyway.)
We could add a new command, @mergeindex, that merges indices without
changing the font?
--
Pat