[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: texi2html tests are huge
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: texi2html tests are huge |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jan 2012 11:04:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:35:51PM +0100, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
> check-all:
> RUN_EXPENSIVE_TESTS=yes $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) check
>
> and then include that fragment in all your Makefile.am files. This time,
> recursion should work seamlessly.
Your solution seems ok. I'll have a look at doing something like that.
(I would have peferred a separate target for long tests and all
tests, but it may very well be that it is possible to do that along
those lines, just with 2 different variables).
--
Pat
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, (continued)
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/01/09
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/01/09
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Patrice Dumas, 2012/01/14
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/01/15
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Patrice Dumas, 2012/01/15
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/01/15
- Re: texi2html tests are huge,
Patrice Dumas <=
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Karl Berry, 2012/01/29
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Patrice Dumas, 2012/01/29
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Patrice Dumas, 2012/01/29
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Karl Berry, 2012/01/29
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Patrice Dumas, 2012/01/30
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Karl Berry, 2012/01/31
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Karl Berry, 2012/01/15
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Patrice Dumas, 2012/01/29
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Patrice Dumas, 2012/01/29
- Re: texi2html tests are huge, Patrice Dumas, 2012/01/14