[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 5-arg xref to Top w/o 3rd arg
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: 5-arg xref to Top w/o 3rd arg |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:33:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:25:26PM -0800, Karl Berry wrote:
> Texinfo friends,
>
> Thus, my idea is to say that if the first argument is Top
> (case-insensitive), the third
> argument is not present, and the fifth argument is present, as in:
> @xref{Top,, info, GNU Info}.
I guess you meant @xref{Top,,, info, GNU Info}.
> the output in TeX is effectively:
> See @cite{GNU Info}
>
> Right now, the output is:
> See Section "Top" in GNU Info.
>
> which is certainly wrong, as the Top node never (or close enough)
> appears in the printed output. So is there a downside? Wdyt?
I think that it would be even more simple to accept empty first
argument, when there is a 4rth or fifth argument. The above would then
be
@xref{,,, info, GNU Info}.
> The Info output isn't affected since it never uses the third (or fifth)
> arg anyway.
But other output formats may be affected, at least docbook and HTML
which nowadays are more similar with TeX output than with info.
> I'm not sure if this would affect the non-TeX formats when
> xrefautomaticsectiontitle on, but I don't imagine it's any problem to
> implement if so :). Patrice?
xrefautomaticsectiontitle is only used if the reference is an internal
reference, that is no 4rth or fifth argument, so this is not an issue.
--
Pat