Re: missing node next using sectioning commands

[Patrice Dumas]

On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:24:22PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
>      @node First node,,Top,Top
>      @chapter first node chapter
> 
>      @node Second node,Third node unnumbered,,Top
>      @chapter second node chapter
> 
>     leads to Second node being node-Next for First node in tp (and not in
>     texi2html).  Is it right?
> 
> And First node being node-Prev for Second node?
> 
> My gut reaction is to say no.  If explicit pointers are provided, they
> should be used, and thus an empty value means that pointer is "null".
> Isn't that what (C)makeinfo does?  (Sorry, can't easily check right now.)

In any case, it was a bogus TODO entry, this was already right in the
code -- and the results...

-- 
Pat