[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Synaptic-devel] Ui Proposal
From: |
Michael Vogt |
Subject: |
Re: [Synaptic-devel] Ui Proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:35:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 10:38:31PM +0200, Sebastian Heinlein wrote:
> Am Son, den 12.10.2003 schrieb Michael Vogt um 14:27:
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 10:55:14AM +0200, Sebastian Heinlein wrote:
> > The problem is, that undo is a operation that works on the whole
> > package list, not only on a given package and that we only supported a
> > limited set of undo operations (currently ~20). So undo might be lead
> > to unexpected results i.e. that it does nothing to the selected pkg at
> > all but to a complettly different package. Saving the undo information
> > on a per-package basis is possible but it would require a huge design
> > change and it leads to different problems. If you undo a change to
> > install a pkg, this affects in the general case more than just this
> > pkg (also this is the case with keep as well).
>
> I also read the first time about the autoinstall feature in aptitude on
> debianplanet.org. A possible long term goal?
Definitely! Actually I started working on this some weeks ago, but
then I decieded to complete the "remove-with-dependencies" support
first. I guess I'll have to look at how aptitude really works, there
are some problems like, "in what state is a pkg when it is installed
with a different frontend?".
bye,
Michael