[PATCH 1/1] Add module_semaphore_free() to destroy semaphore...

[sub]

>>> you mean just to remove module_semaphore_init completely and use
>>> static sem_t my_sem;
>>> in the modules instead of
>>> static sem_t *my_sem;
>>
>> yup :)

> Ok.
> Anatol, would you mind resubmitting your patch based on Trev's comments?

Ok.

To tell the truth , the use of platform-specific functions instead of the 
wrappers (such as module_semaphore_...) is strange to me.
I proceeded  from the assumption that the design of a module API develops 
towards wrapping the platform specific calls, to say nothing of the hiding the 
semaphore's implementation.

    Anatol.