[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool
From: |
Phil Benchoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:24:13 -0400 |
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 09:20:07PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> As of *1. August 2012* I intend to change the minimum version for
> qualification in the pool to 1.1.3.
Our keyserver runs on Centos 5.7. The distribution BDB is 4.3.29 and we
have ocaml 3.12.0. The server is a VM.
* Is there a suggested version of BDB other than >= 4.6? Any reason to
pick 4 versus 5?
* Is there any need to build ocaml 3.12.1?
* It looks like there is a patch for the VM clock issue. Is it in 1.1.3?
Phil
- [Sks-devel] unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region [was: Re: Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool], (continued)
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, John Clizbe, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, John Clizbe, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Jeffrey Johnson, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2012/06/25
Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool,
Phil Benchoff <=