[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool
From: |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:23:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2012-06-25 07:41, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 12:44 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> Please let me know if we should push the timeline some for the
>> 1.1.2 minimum to get more time for testing, as originally stated
>> my primary goal is getting to 1.1.3, so this shouldn't
>> necessarily affect too much, we can still keep that at August 1.
>>
>
> Another week or two of breathing room for the 1.1.2 limit might be
> nice, thanks :)
Lets keep the 18th of July as a tentative date for 1.1.2 migration
then, which gives another two weeks until the 1.1.2 servers fall out
and we're at 1.1.3 to give some buffer in between.
- --
- ----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
http://www.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
- ----------------------------
Corruptissima re publica plurimæ leges
The greater the degeneration of the republic, the more of its laws
- ----------------------------
This email was digitally signed using the OpenPGP
standard. If you want to read more about this
The book: Sending Emails - The Safe Way: An
introduction to OpenPGP security is now
available in both Amazon Kindle and Paperback
format at
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B006RSG1S4/
- ----------------------------
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at http://www.sumptuouscapital.com/pgp/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=f6j2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, (continued)
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, John Clizbe, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, John Clizbe, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Jeffrey Johnson, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool,
Kristian Fiskerstrand <=
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2012/06/25
Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool, Phil Benchoff, 2012/06/25