Re: [task #16105] Submission of Emeraldbank Minetest Mod

[Corwin Brust]

If the intention of that policy is to promote license forward compatibility would it make sense to invite submitters to investigate changing to GPLv3+ rather than rejecting on these grounds and so avoiding the conversation?

Please let me know if I have misunderstood the reasoning for this requirement.

Thanks.

Corwin

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 00:10 Ineiev <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> wrote:

Update of task #16105 (project administration):

                  Status:                    None => Cancelled             
             Assigned to:                    None => ineiev                 
             Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed                 

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #1:

In your package, README.md says it's GPLv3-only.  Savannah has a hosting
requirement that the licensing terms should be compatible with GPLv3 and any
future version.

Cancelling.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16105>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.nongnu.org/