repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GitLab selfhosted


From: Aaron Wolf
Subject: Re: GitLab selfhosted
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:05:04 -0700

I think we're ready enough, I don't think the unresolved issues involve stuff to research. Codeberg isn't likely to make any significant changes soon. The questions are mostly about how to judge situations where they basically (IMO) meet criteria but not *perfectly*. For example, they only allow freely-licensed projects but they haven't fixed an upstream inheritance that shows a license dropdown during new-repo creation that includes both free and non-free licenses (but picking the non-free is still not actually allowed by Codeberg, and they just need to get to fixing this issue). I vote to give qualified pass to such things, including links to open issues in the write-up but accepting that they do indeed not allow non-free licenses.

Someone else has been keeping all the notes I think. I don't have them readily on hand.

Aaron

On 2024-10-25 10:47, Richard Stallman wrote:
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

What are the undecided questons about Codeberg?  Are we ready to write
it up?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]