[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GitLab selfhosted
From: |
Aaron Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: GitLab selfhosted |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:05:04 -0700 |
I think we're ready enough, I don't think the unresolved issues
involve stuff to research. Codeberg isn't likely to make any
significant changes soon. The questions are mostly about how to
judge situations where they basically (IMO) meet criteria but not
*perfectly*. For example, they only allow freely-licensed projects
but they haven't fixed an upstream inheritance that shows a
license dropdown during new-repo creation that includes both free
and non-free licenses (but picking the non-free is still not
actually allowed by Codeberg, and they just need to get to fixing
this issue). I vote to give qualified pass to such things,
including links to open issues in the write-up but accepting that
they do indeed not allow non-free licenses.
Someone else has been keeping all the notes I think. I don't have
them readily on hand.
Aaron
On 2024-10-25 10:47, Richard Stallman
wrote:
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
What are the undecided questons about Codeberg? Are we ready to write
it up?