[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria |
Date: |
Sat, 18 May 2024 12:17:31 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> other than savannah, they all have that issue - none have adequate
> licensing documentation - the reason why github is singled-out on
> that one flaw is just historical - github was the first on the
> list beside savannah - that statement could be made generically;
> but myself, i would remove it -
It makes sense to treat all the sites with that problem alike. But
there are various manners of treatment that we could apply to them
all. This point is important, and we should make that clear to the
reader.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Feedback on our evaluation criteria, Fischers Fritz, 2024/05/14
- Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria, bill-auger, 2024/05/14
- Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria, Richard Stallman, 2024/05/16
- Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria, Richard Stallman, 2024/05/16
- Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria, Richard Stallman, 2024/05/16
- Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria, Richard Stallman, 2024/05/16