repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 17:38:46 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

    > 1. In the above example of GitHub getting grade F for important
    > site functionality requiring nonfree JavaScript, for example,
    > we could perhaps link to an email list discussion where we refer
    > to a particular instance of important functionality breaking
    > when we don't run a particular nonfree JavaScript.

I think this is not a wise idea.

* It would be a lot more work, and we have more important things we
should attend to.

* Pointing at those discussions would focus attention on the
disagreements in the discussions.  That could be counter productive.

I suggest asking your associate to give suggestions of what sorts
of answers perse would want to see.  That way we could look at
this question more clearly.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]