[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria |
Date: |
Thu, 16 May 2024 17:38:46 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> 1. In the above example of GitHub getting grade F for important
> site functionality requiring nonfree JavaScript, for example,
> we could perhaps link to an email list discussion where we refer
> to a particular instance of important functionality breaking
> when we don't run a particular nonfree JavaScript.
I think this is not a wise idea.
* It would be a lot more work, and we have more important things we
should attend to.
* Pointing at those discussions would focus attention on the
disagreements in the discussions. That could be counter productive.
I suggest asking your associate to give suggestions of what sorts
of answers perse would want to see. That way we could look at
this question more clearly.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)