Re: [PATCH: ]new repo-criteria v1.2

[bill-auger]

actually i just noticed something that doesnt look quite right - 
"B1-0: Explains each of the licensing options" is not really related to
"B1: Does not report visitors to other organizations"

i think the intention was for B1-0 to be actually B2-0; and for "B2-0: explains
the importance of including a license notice" to be B2-1 - those three are all
about good licensing documentation

>      <li id="B1"><p>Does not report visitors to other organizations; in
>          particular, no tracking tags in the pages. This means the
>          site must avoid most advertising networks.
> -        <strong>(B1)</strong></p></li>
> +        <strong>(B1)</strong></p>
> +      <ul>
> +        <li id="B1-0"><p>Explains each of the licensing options,
> +            distinguishing between GPL 2 only and GPL 2-or-later, as well as
> +            between GPL 3 only and GPL 3-or-later. Makes recommendations 
> about
> +            whether and when to use each option.
> +            <strong>(B1.0)</strong></p></li>
> +      </ul>
> +    </li>
>  
>      <li id="B2"><p>Does not encourage bad licensing practices (no
>          license, unclear licensing, GPL N only).
> -        <strong>(B2)</strong></p></li>
> +        <strong>(B2)</strong></p>
> +      <ul>
> +      <li id="B2-0"><p>In particular, explains the importance of
> +          including a license notice in all nontrivial source files, not
> +          just in a few places.
> +          <strong>(B2.0)</strong></p></li>
> +      </ul>
> +    </li>