[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH: ]new repo-criteria v1.2
From: |
bill-auger |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH: ]new repo-criteria v1.2 |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Apr 2024 19:44:50 -0400 |
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 18:59:57 -0400 bill-auger wrote:
> + <li id="B2-0"><p>In particular, explains the importance of
> + including a license notice in all nontrivial source files, not
> + just in a few places.
> + <strong>(B2.0)</strong></p></li>
> + </ul>
>
> + <li id="A-plus-7"><p>Helps or reminds users to put license notices
> + in their source files to go with whichever license they have chosen.
> + <strong>(A+7)</strong></p></li>
>
i think i remember this now - IIRC, RMS was thinking that A-plus-7 would be
some tool on the back-end which would detect poorly-licensed files and present
an indication on the UI - where B2-0 is more about good licensing documentation
is that obvious from the current wording?