Re: Review codeberg.org and git.disroot.org

[Yuchen Pei]

On Mon 2022-05-23 10:24:17 -0400, Greg Farough wrote:

> On Mon, May 23 2022, Ian Kelling <iank@fsf.org> wrote:
>
>> Akib Azmain Turja <akib@disroot.org> writes:
>>
>>> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>>> Ian Kelling <iank@fsf.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Wuzzy <Wuzzy@disroot.org> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello! I like to suggest adding reviews for https://codeberg.org and
>>>>> https://git.disroot.org, two instances of Gitea <https://gitea.io>.
>>>>
>>>> Good idea. Someone should do an evaluation and post it. It is just a
>>>> comment what they found with respect to each point in the criteria.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I use Codeberg and also have an account at Disroot's Gitea.  Can someone
>>> tell me about the evaluation process?
>>
>> Here is the process as far as I know:
>>
>> First, anyone does the evaluation by going through all the points, and
>> documenting what they find. Then post it here. Also, at that point or
>> later, they should post a patch to the website that has the changes
>> based on their evaluation, or at least what the text should say. Then
>> people on the list review the evaluation, comment on it, it may need
>> changes, and when there are no more changes to make, someone with access
>> to update the site does it.
>
> There was a partial evaluation of Codeberg sometime last year. A good
> place to start would be reviewing this thread from the list, and
> seeing if everything still applies.
>
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00000.html>
>

There's also <https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Codeberg> but this link is
included in that thread too.

> -g


Best,
Yuchen

-- 
PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040  4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0
          <https://ypei.org/assets/ypei-pubkey.txt>

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature