Re: Review codeberg.org and git.disroot.org

[Greg Farough]

On Mon, May 23 2022, Ian Kelling <iank@fsf.org> wrote:

> Akib Azmain Turja <akib@disroot.org> writes:
>
>> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>> Ian Kelling <iank@fsf.org> writes:
>>
>>> Wuzzy <Wuzzy@disroot.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hello! I like to suggest adding reviews for https://codeberg.org and
>>>> https://git.disroot.org, two instances of Gitea <https://gitea.io>.
>>>
>>> Good idea. Someone should do an evaluation and post it. It is just a
>>> comment what they found with respect to each point in the criteria.
>>>
>>
>> I use Codeberg and also have an account at Disroot's Gitea.  Can someone
>> tell me about the evaluation process?
>
> Here is the process as far as I know:
>
> First, anyone does the evaluation by going through all the points, and
> documenting what they find. Then post it here. Also, at that point or
> later, they should post a patch to the website that has the changes
> based on their evaluation, or at least what the text should say. Then
> people on the list review the evaluation, comment on it, it may need
> changes, and when there are no more changes to make, someone with access
> to update the site does it.

There was a partial evaluation of Codeberg sometime last year. A good
place to start would be reviewing this thread from the list, and
seeing if everything still applies.

<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00000.html>

-g

-- 
Greg Farough // Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation

Join the FSF and help us defend software freedom: https://my.fsf.org

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature