[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed new criteria
From: |
Greg Farough |
Subject: |
Re: proposed new criteria |
Date: |
Thu, 05 May 2022 18:33:57 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, May 05 2022, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
> What do people think of this?
>
>
> > I've made a proposed-new-repo-criteria.html page just now, and have
> > posted it: <https://gnu.org/software/proposed-new-repo-criteria.html>.
>
> Thank you. I just looked at that.
>
> Three of the changes are just clarifications, not changes of
> substance. I think it would help people read this to divide the list
> of changes into two sublists, one for substantial changes and one for
> clarifications of wording.
>
> For the three that are substantive, it would be good to add a one-line
> or two-line description of the change.
Good idea. I've just done that.
I've also added a link to that page from repo-criteria.html, which
mentions the proposed list and encourages people to give feedback:
> <p>You can also help us by providing feedback on
> our <a href="/software/proposed-new-repo-criteria.html">proposed
> updates</a> to the repo criteria.</p>
This mailing list is mentioned in the paragraph above that one, so it
should be clear to people where to send any comments.
-g
--
Greg Farough // Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
Join the FSF and help us defend software freedom: https://my.fsf.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature