[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving forward with evaluating sourcehut, codeberg and notabug
|
From: |
Greg Farough |
|
Subject: |
Re: Moving forward with evaluating sourcehut, codeberg and notabug |
|
Date: |
Tue, 08 Feb 2022 15:59:33 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, Feb 08 2022, Craig Topham <craigt@fsf.org> wrote:
> repo-criteria-discuss folks,
>
> I'm not familiar with the process. How can we move forward on
> evaluating sourcehut, codeberg and notabug?
Sourcehut and Notabug were evaluated in 2021. Those evals were OK'd by
RMS, and as far as I can tell are still accurate. I've just installed
those.
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00053.html>
Codeberg almost got there, but I couldn't find a conclusive grade or
definitive OK in the list archives.
-g
--
Greg Farough // Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
Join the FSF and help us defend software freedom: https://my.fsf.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature