Re: Please review codeberg.org

[Yuchen Pei]

bill-auger <bill-auger@peers.community> writes:

> On Sat, 09 Oct 2021 21:44:04 +1100 Yuchen wrote:
> > Do you mean the reason for B0 and B2 failing are no longer 
> > true?
>
> i dont know - i have not reviewed codeberg - it was a very long
> review and was difficult to find where/how B0 or B2 were
> resolved - i found one post, which indicates that B0 was
> resolved, and that the wiki checklist was updated to reflect 
> that
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-07/msg00016.html

That was about C0, not B0/B2, see the context of that message 
e.g. <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00042.html>

> On Sat, 09 Oct 2021 21:44:04 +1100 Yuchen wrote:
> > I don't see changes in this, at least some scripts at 
> > codeberg.org 
> > are still blocked by librejs.
>
> the wiki checklist still indicates that it is failing though; so
> there is conflicting information between the wiki and the
> mailing list

B0 is still failing, C0 was no longer failing and the wiki was 
updated accordingly:

<https://libreplanet.org/wiki?title=Codeberg&diff=prev&oldid=65241>

> what i8 remember, is that the codeberg team was working to
> satisfy the 'B' criteria; and i presented it as such,
> assuming that those changes were relatively simple, and could be
> accomplished in the short time while waiting for final approval
>
> now that the review was accepted and ready to publish, it is not
> obvious that B0 and B2 were ever satisfied as expected - so i
> suppose that codeberg should enter the list at the 'C' level,
> rather than the 'B' level as proposed
>
> if someone can demonstrate otherwise, then the wiki should be
> updated - i would want to do that now; to remove this confusion
> for the future


--
Best,
Yuchen

PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040  4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0
          <https://ypei.me/assets/ypei-pubkey.txt>

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature