[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please review codeberg.org
From: |
Yuchen Pei |
Subject: |
Re: Please review codeberg.org |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Oct 2021 21:44:04 +1100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.2 |
bill-auger <bill-auger@peers.community> writes:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:53:42 +1000 Yuchen wrote:
I've updated the libreplanet checklist.
the checklist shows B0 and B2 failing - which passing? - should
codeberg get a 'C' for now; and possibly upgrade it later - or
is it the complete 'B' set now (checklist should be updated)?
Do you mean the reason for B0 and B2 failing are no longer true?
Below I copy the wiki descriptions at
<https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Codeberg>:
☐ B0 - Compatible with LibreJS (or equivalent tool)
NOTES: some scripts are not labeled, uses the name "MIT" for
expat license.
I don't see changes in this, at least some scripts at codeberg.org
are still blocked by librejs.
☐ B2 - Does not encourage unclear licensing
NOTES: no diff between GPLv3 and GPLv3-or-later repositories
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00022.html
--
Best,
Yuchen
PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040 4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0
<https://ypei.me/assets/ypei-pubkey.txt>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature