[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:58:47 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > B2.1 satisfies
> > (and thus shadows) A3, so A3 could be removed - that would put
> > adequate licensing documentation at the 'B' level
Proposed B2.1 talks about explaining the options offered.
Currently, A3 says to offer AGPL 3-or-later as an option.
They are orthogonal.
I see no reason for the proposed change in A3.
That would indeed make it redundant with the proposed B2.1.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)