at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?

[bill-auger]

i will start a new thread about this issue, as it is a common
concern, shared by C5, B2.1, and A3 - as i noted on the C5
thread, all of C5, B2.1, and A3, would be satisfied by good
documentation regarding licensing practices

it should be decided, at which level, is adequate licensing
documentation required? - the definitive answer to that question
could affect all of C5, B2.1, A3, all of which have proposed
modifications now

the proposed new criteria B2.1 requires adequate licensing
documentation - as it is (or could be) worded, B2.1 satisfies
(and thus shadows) A3, so A3 could be removed - that would put
adequate licensing documentation at the 'B' level

if adequate licensing documentation should be an 'A' level
criteria, then i suggest B2.1 is moved to replace A3

if adequate licensing documentation should be a 'C' level
criteria, then i suggest B2.1 is moved to the 'C' level, and
still A3 would not be needed