[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Need for some guidelines to improve participation
From: |
Bert Van de Poel |
Subject: |
Need for some guidelines to improve participation |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jun 2021 01:52:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 |
Dear fellow repo-criteria-discuss members,
As some of you have remarked (including me), discussions here tend to
fizzle before things are properly finished. I would like to point to an
in my opinion clear explanation why this keeps happening and would like
to hear from others if their limited participation stems from the same
origins.
Specifically, I've noticed a tendency by some of the more active members
of this list to answer a single email in several steps. Either splitting
up a single email into several responses, or responding first to the
original and then to some of the other reactions. This creates a thread
structures that's far from linear and I would say even makes it truly
look like a nine headed hydra. For the past three or so weekends I had
planned to tackle my unread email from this list, but found myself ever
more demotivated by just even vaguely trying to grasp who exactly has
been responding to who and where discussions were going. As the thread
view of the codeberg thread (attached as a screenshot to this email)
illustrates, once you get behind a few days it's far from easy to catch up.
I fear that like me, many members here find it hard to motivate
themselves to wade through split up argumentation. I would personally
much prefer if discussions were kept more linear. If people feel like we
should mix discussion of several criteria within a single thread, then I
suggest we start completely new threads with a separate subject for each
criteria, though I personally don't see why we couldn't all discuss them
in one, linear thread. Of course, in practice it's far from realistic to
always stay perfectly linear, but it is my belief that more people would
get involved and give their opinion on this list if the discussions were
more structured and linear.
I hope to hear from those members who have been less active, and see
what their take on the matter is. If of course I'm alone in this concern
I'll gladly keep my frustrations about this to myself, but if others
have these same problems, I suggest we should adhere certain guidelines
in the spirit of better participation and cooperation.
Kind regards,
Bert Van de Poel
Screenshot at 2021-06-15 01-46-51.png
Description: PNG image
- Need for some guidelines to improve participation,
Bert Van de Poel <=