repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Evals and press released published


From: Mike Gerwitz
Subject: Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Evals and press released published
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:54:04 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux)

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 14:00:20 -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> GitHub says: "Important site functionality does not work without running
> nonfree JavaScript."
>
> and Sourceforge says: "Important site functionality doesn't work without
> JavaScript, or with LibreJS enabled." which is a confusing sentence with
> a grammatically invalid comma.
>
> This makes the criteria totally unclear. Just say for BOTH of them
> "Important site functionality does not work with LibreJS enabled." Then
> the criteria page itself can explain further.
>
> I hope this could be updated ASAP.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

*** eval-page-draft-old.html    2016-04-25 20:40:29.890602588 -0400
--- eval-page-draft.html        2016-04-25 20:41:14.612246647 -0400
***************
*** 166,173 ****
  
  <ul>
    <li id="SourceForge-C0">
!     Important site functionality doesn't work without JavaScript, or with
!     LibreJS ena
    </li>
  
    <li id="SourceForge-C2">Rejects users from certain countries.</li>
--- 166,174 ----
  
  <ul>
    <li id="SourceForge-C0">
!     Important site functionality does not work without running nonfree
!     JavaScript.
!     (<a href="repo-criteria.html#C0">C0</a>)
    </li>
  
    <li id="SourceForge-C2">Rejects users from certain countries.</li>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

GNU ethical repository criteria evaluations

We maintain this evaluation report presenting the compliance level of repository services with the GNU ethical repository criteria. There are some criteria that we can’t possibly verify, in which case we accept the site maintainer’s word on the matter. This evaluation is done by volunteers coordinated by the Free Software Foundation, and you are welcome to contribute.

Site Grade Date Criteria Version
GNU Savannah A 1.0
GitLab C 1.0
GitHub F 1.0
SourceForge F 1.0

GNU SavannahA

Savannah has already acheived the highest grade for ethical hosting; these are the issues that would need to be addressed for it to earn extra credit. If you would like to volunteer to help make some of these changes, please join the Savannah team.

GitLabC

Things that prevent it from moving up to the next grade, B:

GitHubF

Things that prevent it from moving up to the next grade, C:

SourceForgeF

Things that prevent it from moving up to the next grade, C:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]