Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}

[Mike Gerwitz]

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 13:17:19 -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> Regardless of the meta things, the wording on the Sourceforge report
> needs to be clear at least. It could at least say "these functions won't
> work with LibreJS on" with no further explanation, rather than the
> confusing wording I saw.

https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html

What do you think?

The press release hasn't gone out yet, so Zak requested that we still
keep quiet about it.

-- 
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature