repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (ak


From: Zak Rogoff
Subject: Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:45:42 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.7.0

On 04/13/2016 11:26 PM, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:52:08 -0400, Zak Rogoff wrote:
>> FOOTNOTE * In fact, if someone wants to get in touch with Richard and
>> find a way to clarify how to evaluate C5 against situations with no
>> license by default, that would be a helpful project.
> 
> Wouldn't this fall under B2?
> 
>   Does not encourage bad licensing practices (no license, unclear
>   licensing, GPL N only). (B2)
> 

Oh, yup, you're right. It does. Scratch that.

-- 
Zak Rogoff // Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]