[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Should the "extra credit" really be extra?
|
From: |
Zak Rogoff |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Should the "extra credit" really be extra? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:45:22 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
On 11/04/2015 02:44 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> FWIW, I agree *strongly* with that sentiment. We don't need to revisit
> it, but from earlier discussion, I made it clear that I think many of
> the "A" grade level things like "GNU/Linux" vs "Linux" wording really
> should be only extra-credit level, and I agree with Niels that some
> current extra-credit stuff like accessibility and privacy should be
> considered more important.
I won't say I disagree. The criteria as they are embody Richard's
particular perspective on what's important. I do think that it's great
for us to have them even if everyone doesn't agree on all the details.
--
Zak Rogoff
Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
GnuPG key fingerprint: 6EB2 B137 347E 6F7C DEDC AFF6 82DE 8D64 B509 0AC8