[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Launched! Evaluation time
From: |
Aaron Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Launched! Evaluation time |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:52:39 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
Quick note for whoever did the SourceForge stuff: if it matters to
differntiate between LibreJS-recognized vs non-recognized automatically
but still free, Sourceforge uses
https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura almost entirely for all it's
stuff that isn't the landing pages and downloads (i.e. for wiki,
tickets, code views, etc), I have no reason to think it's even modified
really. I am not suggesting that SF passes otherwise, but I *definitely*
think there's some sense to recognizing that aspect (and the fact that
anyone could self-host Allura, of course)
On 10/22/2015 08:01 PM, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 19:38:55 -0200, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro wrote:
>> Feel free to suggest improvements. Although I do have a reasonably
>> current evaluation of GitLab ready for publication, I decided to let
>> this to Mike's discretion.
>
> We're holding off on the GitLab evaluation release until certain items
> are addressed. I'll keep the list up to date.
>
--
Aaron Wolf
co-founder, Snowdrift.coop
music teacher, wolftune.com