[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] State of the rdiff-backup project
From: |
Tobias Leupold |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] State of the rdiff-backup project |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Aug 2015 19:30:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.5-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) |
> You're not going to change that without a major rewrite.
> Like you, I'm no Python guy.
I like Python. And I like rdiff-backup. But perhaps, some skilled programmer
has the energy to take the "chance" of the questionable state of rdiff-backup
by only continuing the concept of rdiff-backup and rewriting some similar
program from scratch, e. g. in C++. Perhaps with some metadata database to
solve the regression issue (which really sucks). And so on.
Not that I would be remotely skilled enough in C++ to do so ... I'm only
thinking about what could be done ...
- [rdiff-backup-users] State of the rdiff-backup project, Claus-Justus Heine, 2015/08/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] State of the rdiff-backup project, Tobias Leupold, 2015/08/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] State of the rdiff-backup project, Dominic Raferd, 2015/08/14
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] State of the rdiff-backup project, Claus-Justus Heine, 2015/08/14
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] State of the rdiff-backup project, Frank Crawford, 2015/08/14
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] State of the rdiff-backup project, Yves Martin, 2015/08/15
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] State of the rdiff-backup project, Frank Crawford, 2015/08/15
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] State of the rdiff-backup project, Robert Nichols, 2015/08/15
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] State of the rdiff-backup project, Frank Crawford, 2015/08/15