|
From: | Robert Nichols |
Subject: | [rdiff-backup-users] Re: rdiff-backup --verify 1.2.8 running around in circles |
Date: | Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:25:44 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.10 |
On 02/21/2011 12:06 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 21/02/11 00:22, Robert Nichols wrote:The patch file contains the following: +WARNING this will not detect if your repository has already been corrupted. +It will create integrity signatures with the files as they exist when you +run the script. Any corruption that happened before that point can only +be detected with --verify-at-time. However, after you run this script you +can use --verify-full to verify that nothing has changed since you ran this +script.I think this warning refers to the integrify.py module not to the patch as a whole. The comment for the whole patch is: +Added --verify-full, which verifies the integrity of an entire repository +including all increments and metadata. This should be much faster than +--verify-at-time=<date in the past>, and is more comprehensive in terms of +what is verified.
Read the whole comment for the integrify.py module: +run this script on your repository to generate integrity data for +rdiff-backup --verify-full + +WARNING this will not detect if your repository has already been corrupted. +It will create integrity signatures with the files as they exist when you +run the script. Any corruption that happened before that point can only +be detected with --verify-at-time. However, after you run this script you +can use --verify-full to verify that nothing has changed since you ran this +script. According to this, the script generates the integrity data, and -verify-full simply uses this integrity data to confirm that nothing has changed since the integrity data was generated. I just don't see any other way to interpret that. You say you have a version with the patch installed. What happens if you run --verify-full before generating the integrity data? -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |