[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance
From: |
Dave Howorth |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:41:25 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20060911) |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:15:53PM -0700, Corey Puffalt wrote:
>> Is anyone else having any performance issues with rdiff-backup?
>
> I've run into numerous cases where rdiff-backup just doesn't perform
> well, especially over a network. For example, doing a restore I'm doing
> good to see 800kB/s (according to Activity Monitor in OS X), while an
> scp of the same file will do 2+ MB/s.
>
> Reverting a failed backup is also very slow. As is listing the size of
> increments.
Does anybody know of an alternative that performs better?
I have a filesystem with millions of hard links and so far rdiff-backup
is the fastest thing I've found, even though it is slow.
Cheers, Dave
- [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Corey Puffalt, 2007/02/11
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Jim C. Nasby, 2007/02/12
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance,
Dave Howorth <=
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Greg Freemyer, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Charles Duffy, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Scott Lamb, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Corey Puffalt, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, rdiff, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Scott Lamb, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Dave Howorth, 2007/02/14