[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change
From: |
dean gaudet |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Nov 2006 11:24:07 -0800 (PST) |
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, dean gaudet wrote:
> yep -- but we could store an actual 0-length file instead... so we're not
> wasting an entire disk block on many filesystems. better to name it
> .nodiff or something else so we can distinguish between an incompletely
> written .diff.gz and a file with no differences.
>
> there's another case of frequently changing metadata -- if you backup from
> an LVM snapshot the device number changes now and then (because it's
> dynamic). the inode remains the same... this used to cause me a lot of
> disk space wastage but i stopped using LVM and so the problem dropped in
> priority for me.
actually this is probably going to be more of a problem in the newfangled
world of dynamically assigned device numbers.
i wonder if there's any sane API we can use to get the UUID of a
filesystem.
-dean
- [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, Michael Stucki, 2006/11/16
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, dean gaudet, 2006/11/18
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, Andrew Ferguson, 2006/11/18
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, dean gaudet, 2006/11/18
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change,
dean gaudet <=
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, Andrew Ferguson, 2006/11/19
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, dean gaudet, 2006/11/20
- [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Suggestion for documentation change, Michael Stucki, 2006/11/20
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Suggestion for documentation change, dean gaudet, 2006/11/20