[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC 3/7] migration: Block migration comment or code is wrong
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC 3/7] migration: Block migration comment or code is wrong |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Oct 2022 15:12:26 -0400 |
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 05:15:56AM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> And it appears that what is wrong is the code. During bulk stage we
> need to make sure that some block is dirty, but no games with
> max_size at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> ---
> migration/block.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [RFC 0/7] migration patches for VFIO, Juan Quintela, 2022/10/02
- [RFC 1/7] migration: Remove res_compatible parameter, Juan Quintela, 2022/10/02
- [RFC 3/7] migration: Block migration comment or code is wrong, Juan Quintela, 2022/10/02
- Re: [RFC 3/7] migration: Block migration comment or code is wrong,
Stefan Hajnoczi <=
- [RFC 4/7] migration: Split save_live_pending() into state_pending_*, Juan Quintela, 2022/10/02
- [RFC 2/7] migration: No save_live_pending() method uses the QEMUFile parameter, Juan Quintela, 2022/10/02
- [RFC 5/7] migration: Remove unused threshold_size parameter, Juan Quintela, 2022/10/02
- [RFC 6/7] migration: simplify migration_iteration_run(), Juan Quintela, 2022/10/02
- [RFC 7/7] migration: call qemu_savevm_state_pending_exact() with the guest stopped, Juan Quintela, 2022/10/02