[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines
From: |
Christian Borntraeger |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:42:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 |
On 02.04.20 13:39, Igor Mammedov wrote:
[...]
>>>
>>>> + "MB to match machine restrictions. Consider updating "
>>>> + "the guest definition.i\n", sz / MiB, newsz / MiB);
>>>>
>>>
>>> also it might be better to use size_to_str() to format numbers
>>
>> The text explicitly talks about 'MB'... not sure if it would be
>> confusing if the user specified MB and ended up with GB or so in this
>> message.
>
> MB can be dropped, since it still might not match what user specified with -m
> it could be specified in b/kb/mb/gb over there
>
> so I'd drop MB and print value size_to_str() returns
> (it will add appropriate suffix if I'm not mistaken)
>
The return value of size_to_str must be freed. Arent we going overboard for such
a message?
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines, (continued)
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines, Igor Mammedov, 2020/04/01
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines, Igor Mammedov, 2020/04/02
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines,
Christian Borntraeger <=
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines, Igor Mammedov, 2020/04/02
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines, Christian Borntraeger, 2020/04/02
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines, Christian Borntraeger, 2020/04/02
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines, Cornelia Huck, 2020/04/02
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines, Cornelia Huck, 2020/04/02