[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] vl/s390: fixup ram sizes for compat machines
From: |
Christian Borntraeger |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2] vl/s390: fixup ram sizes for compat machines |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Apr 2020 13:55:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 |
On 01.04.20 10:58, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.04.20 10:50, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Older QEMU versions did fixup the ram size to match what can be reported
>> via sclp. We need to mimic this behaviour for machine types 4.2 and
>> older to not fail on inbound migration for memory sizes that do not fit.
>> Old machines with proper aligned memory sizes are not affected.
>>
>> Alignment table:
>> VM size (<=) | Alignment
>> --------------------------
>> 1020M | 1M
>> 2040M | 2M
>> 4080M | 4M
>> 8160M | 8M
>> 16320M | 16M
>> 32640M | 32M
>> 65280M | 64M
>> 130560M | 128M
>> 261120M | 256M
>> 522240M | 512M
>> 1044480M | 1G
>> 2088960M | 2G
>> 4177920M | 4G
>> 8355840M | 8G
>>
>> Suggested action is to replace unaligned -m value with a suitable
>> aligned one or to use a machine version >= 5.0 as future versions might
>> remove the compatibility handling.
>>
>> For machine types >= 5.0 we can simply use an increment size of 1M and
>> use the full range of increment number which allows for all possible
>> memory sizes. The old limitation of having a maximum of 1020 increments
>> was added for standby memory, which we no longer support. With that we
>> can now support even weird memory sizes like 10001234 MB.
>>
>
> You should probably add while the maxram_size changes are done.
Yes, I need to mention the maxram changes.
>
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>> #include "qemu/ctype.h"
>> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>> #include "qemu/option.h"
>> +#include "qemu/qemu-print.h"
>> #include "s390-pci-bus.h"
>> #include "sysemu/reset.h"
>> #include "hw/s390x/storage-keys.h"
>> @@ -579,6 +580,23 @@ static void s390_nmi(NMIState *n, int cpu_index, Error
>> **errp)
>> s390_cpu_restart(S390_CPU(cs));
>> }
>>
>> +static ram_addr_t s390_fixup_ram_size(ram_addr_t sz)
>> +{
>> + /* same logic as in sclp.c */
>> + int increment_size = 20;
>
> missing empty line
ack.
>> + while ((sz >> increment_size) > MAX_STORAGE_INCREMENTS) {
>> + increment_size++;
>> + }
>> + if (sz != sz >> increment_size << increment_size) {
>
> I'd just cache the calculation so ...
something like
while ((sz >> increment_size) > MAX_STORAGE_INCREMENTS) {
increment_size++;
}
newsz = sz >> increment_size << increment_size;
if (sz != newsz) {
qemu_printf("Ram size %" PRIu64 "MB was fixed up to %" PRIu64
"MB to match machine restrictions. Consider updating "
"the guest definition.\n",
sz / MiB, newsz / MiB);
}
return newsz;
?
>
>> + qemu_printf("Ram size %" PRIu64 "MB was fixed up to %" PRIu64
>> + "MB to match machine restrictions. Consider updating "
>> + "the guest definition.\n",
>> + sz / 1048576,
>> + (sz >> increment_size << increment_size) / 1048576);
>
> .. this looks less ugly.
>
> Please use MiB instead of 1048576. (see my original patch)
ack.
>> + }
>> + return sz >> increment_size << increment_size;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void ccw_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>> {
>> MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
>> @@ -808,6 +826,7 @@ static void
>> ccw_machine_4_2_instance_options(MachineState *machine)
>> static void ccw_machine_4_2_class_options(MachineClass *mc)
>> {
>> ccw_machine_5_0_class_options(mc);
>> + mc->fixup_ram_size = s390_fixup_ram_size;
>> compat_props_add(mc->compat_props, hw_compat_4_2, hw_compat_4_2_len);
>> }
>> DEFINE_CCW_MACHINE(4_2, "4.2", false);
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> index d8ae207731..d843c8fea2 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static void sclp_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> */
>> qdev_set_parent_bus(DEVICE(sclp->event_facility), sysbus_get_default());
>>
>> - ret = s390_set_memory_limit(machine->maxram_size, &hw_limit);
>> + ret = s390_set_memory_limit(machine->ram_size, &hw_limit);
>
> I mentioned in my patch why I left this as is. But we can change that
> with memory hotplug support.
Ok, will drop this.
>
>
>> if (ret == -E2BIG) {
>> error_setg(&err, "host supports a maximum of %" PRIu64 " GB",
>> hw_limit / GiB);
>> @@ -361,27 +361,20 @@ out:
>> static void sclp_memory_init(SCLPDevice *sclp)
>> {
>> MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> + MachineClass *machine_class = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(qdev_get_machine());
>> ram_addr_t initial_mem = machine->ram_size;
>> int increment_size = 20;
>>
>> /* The storage increment size is a multiple of 1M and is a power of 2.
>> - * The number of storage increments must be MAX_STORAGE_INCREMENTS or
>> fewer.
>> + * For some machine types, the number of storage increments must be
>> + * MAX_STORAGE_INCREMENTS or fewer.
>> * The variable 'increment_size' is an exponent of 2 that can be
>> * used to calculate the size (in bytes) of an increment. */
>> - while ((initial_mem >> increment_size) > MAX_STORAGE_INCREMENTS) {
>> + while (machine_class->fixup_ram_size != NULL &&
>> + (initial_mem >> increment_size) > MAX_STORAGE_INCREMENTS) {
>> increment_size++;
>> }
>> sclp->increment_size = increment_size;
>
> IIRC one could define ram size in KB. Not sure if it is worth checking
> against that.
> [...]
If this is not aligned to 1MB, that would already fail when registering the
memslot, I think.
>
>> static void sclp_init(Object *obj)
>> diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
>> index 236d239c19..0532143327 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/boards.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/boards.h
>> @@ -152,6 +152,12 @@ typedef struct {
>> * It also will be used as a way to optin into "-m" option support.
>> * If it's not set by board, '-m' will be ignored and generic code will
>> * not create default RAM MemoryRegion.
>> + * @fixup_ram_size:
>> + * amends user provided ram size (with -m option) using machine
>
> s/amends/Amends/
ack
>> + * specific algorithm. to be used by old machine types for compat
>
> s/to/To/
ack
>> + * purposes only.
>> + * Applies only to default memory backend, i.e. explicit memory backend
>
> "i.e.,"
ack