[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v9] s390x: protvirt: Fence huge pages
From: |
Janosch Frank |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v9] s390x: protvirt: Fence huge pages |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:06:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 |
On 3/13/20 9:21 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 12.03.20 17:25, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Let's bail out of the protected transition if we detect that huge
>> pages might be in use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>
>> I'd like to squash this into the unpack patch to give a proper error
>> message if we try to transition into the protected mode while being
>> backed by huge pages.
>
> Looks good.
> But maybe we can do it better. Why not reverse the logic and
> instead of having kvm_s390_get_hpage_1m, let us define an protvirt_allowed
> that as of today only returns hugepages != 1:
> Then we could (for kvm-stub.c) also say protvirt_allowed=false;
> And if other reasons come along we can extend.
>
> We could also keep this patch separate, does not really matter.
The *_allowed() functions are all based on the machine and part of
s390-virtio-ccw.c so having one in kvm.c looks strange.
!protvirt_allowed could have any number of reasons in the future, I
introduced this patch to give a specific error message that can help the
user to chose the right options when looking for the error.
Other ideas or a revised one?
>
>>
>> ---
>> hw/s390x/ipl.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 1 -
>> target/s390x/diag.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
>> target/s390x/kvm-stub.c | 5 +++++
>> target/s390x/kvm.c | 5 +++++
>> target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h | 1 +
>> 6 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.h b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
>> index af5bb130a6334821..95e3183c9cccf8b6 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/ipl.h
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
>> @@ -185,6 +185,22 @@ struct S390IPLState {
>> typedef struct S390IPLState S390IPLState;
>> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(offsetof(S390IPLState, iplb) & 3, "alignment of iplb
>> wrong");
>>
>> +#define DIAG_308_RC_OK 0x0001
>> +#define DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF 0x0102
>> +#define DIAG_308_RC_INVALID 0x0402
>> +#define DIAG_308_RC_NO_PV_CONF 0x0902
>> +#define DIAG_308_RC_INVAL_FOR_PV 0x0a02
>> +
>> +#define DIAG308_RESET_MOD_CLR 0
>> +#define DIAG308_RESET_LOAD_NORM 1
>> +#define DIAG308_LOAD_CLEAR 3
>> +#define DIAG308_LOAD_NORMAL_DUMP 4
>> +#define DIAG308_SET 5
>> +#define DIAG308_STORE 6
>> +#define DIAG308_PV_SET 8
>> +#define DIAG308_PV_STORE 9
>> +#define DIAG308_PV_START 10
>> +
>> #define S390_IPL_TYPE_FCP 0x00
>> #define S390_IPL_TYPE_CCW 0x02
>> #define S390_IPL_TYPE_PV 0x05
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> index ebdaaa3a001f6e8c..d32f35c7f47b9c1d 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> @@ -361,7 +361,6 @@ out_err:
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> -#define DIAG_308_RC_INVAL_FOR_PV 0x0a02
>> static void s390_machine_inject_pv_error(CPUState *cs)
>> {
>> int r1 = (cs->kvm_run->s390_sieic.ipa & 0x00f0) >> 4;
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
>> index b245e557037ded06..b1ca81633b83bbdc 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/diag.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> #include "hw/s390x/ipl.h"
>> #include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
>> #include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
>> +#include "kvm_s390x.h"
>>
>> int handle_diag_288(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3)
>> {
>> @@ -50,21 +51,6 @@ int handle_diag_288(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1,
>> uint64_t r3)
>> return diag288_class->handle_timer(diag288, func, timeout);
>> }
>>
>> -#define DIAG_308_RC_OK 0x0001
>> -#define DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF 0x0102
>> -#define DIAG_308_RC_INVALID 0x0402
>> -#define DIAG_308_RC_NO_PV_CONF 0x0902
>> -
>> -#define DIAG308_RESET_MOD_CLR 0
>> -#define DIAG308_RESET_LOAD_NORM 1
>> -#define DIAG308_LOAD_CLEAR 3
>> -#define DIAG308_LOAD_NORMAL_DUMP 4
>> -#define DIAG308_SET 5
>> -#define DIAG308_STORE 6
>> -#define DIAG308_PV_SET 8
>> -#define DIAG308_PV_STORE 9
>> -#define DIAG308_PV_START 10
>> -
>> static int diag308_parm_check(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t
>> addr,
>> uintptr_t ra, bool write)
>> {
>> @@ -166,6 +152,13 @@ out:
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> + if (kvm_s390_get_hpage_1m()) {
>> + error_report("Protected VMs can currently not be backed with "
>> + "huge pages");
>> + env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVAL_FOR_PV;
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> s390_ipl_reset_request(cs, S390_RESET_PV);
>> break;
>> default:
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c b/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c
>> index c4cd497f850eb9c7..aa185017a2a886ca 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ int kvm_s390_vcpu_interrupt_post_load(S390CPU *cpu)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +int kvm_s390_get_hpage_1m(void)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> int kvm_s390_get_ri(void)
>> {
>> return 0;
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
>> index 1d6fd6a27b48e35f..c695941076b7aead 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
>> @@ -321,6 +321,11 @@ void kvm_s390_set_max_pagesize(uint64_t pagesize, Error
>> **errp)
>> cap_hpage_1m = 1;
>> }
>>
>> +int kvm_s390_get_hpage_1m(void)
>> +{
>> + return cap_hpage_1m;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void ccw_machine_class_foreach(ObjectClass *oc, void *opaque)
>> {
>> MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h b/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h
>> index 0b21789796d7c462..dea813f450153c34 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h
>> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ void kvm_s390_program_interrupt(S390CPU *cpu, uint16_t
>> code);
>> int kvm_s390_set_cpu_state(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t cpu_state);
>> void kvm_s390_vcpu_interrupt_pre_save(S390CPU *cpu);
>> int kvm_s390_vcpu_interrupt_post_load(S390CPU *cpu);
>> +int kvm_s390_get_hpage_1m(void);
>> int kvm_s390_get_ri(void);
>> int kvm_s390_get_gs(void);
>> int kvm_s390_get_clock(uint8_t *tod_high, uint64_t *tod_clock);
>>
>
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [PATCH v9 12/15] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA, (continued)
- [PATCH v9 06/15] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/11
- Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support, no-reply, 2020/03/11
- Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support, no-reply, 2020/03/11
- [PATCH v9] s390x: protvirt: Fence huge pages, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/12
- Re: [PATCH v9] s390x: protvirt: Fence huge pages, Cornelia Huck, 2020/03/17