[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility
From: |
Janosch Frank |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Mar 2020 15:20:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 |
On 3/5/20 3:15 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +static void s390_machine_unprotect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
>>>> +{
>>>> + CPUState *t;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!ms->pv)
>>>> + return;
>>>
>>> How can this ever happen? g_assert(ms->pv) ?
>>
>> Currently not, that's only used in the follow up patches with the ballon
>> and migration blocker
>
> Even then, why should we unprotect when not protected. That looks wrong
> to me and has to be fixed in the other patches,
I fixed it this morning :)
>
>>
>>>
>>> Also, i don't see this function getting called from anywhere else except
>>> when s390_machine_protect() fails. That looks wrong. This has to be
>>> called when going out of PV mode.
>>
>> Yes, but that's in the diag308 1-4 patch.
>
> The way patches were split up is somewhat sub-optimal for review.
Thanks
I'll try to find a better split up of the code
>
> [...]
>
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case S390_RESET_PV: /* Subcode 10 */
>>>> + subsystem_reset();
>>>> + s390_crypto_reset();
>>>> +
>>>> + CPU_FOREACH(t) {
>>>> + if (t == cs) {
>>>> + continue;
>>>> + }
>>>> + run_on_cpu(t, s390_do_cpu_full_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>>>> + }
>>>> + run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (s390_machine_protect(ms)) {
>>>> + s390_machine_inject_pv_error(cs);
>>>
>>> Ah, so it's not an actual exception. BUT: All other guest cpus were
>>> reset, can the guest deal with that?
>>
>> Well, all other CPUs should be stopped for diag308, no?
>> Also it's done by the bootloader and not a OS which just stops its cpus
>> and goes into protected mode.
>>
>>>
>>> (run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL) should go after the
>>> s390_machine_protect() I assume - the change you had in the other patch)
>>
>> That's not a good idea, I want to reset before we automatically call the
>> UV routines on a reset.
>
> But how can s390_machine_inject_pv_error(cs) be any effective if you
> already reset the CPU?
>
Because a normal cpu reset does not clear out the registers.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility, David Hildenbrand, 2020/03/05
Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility, Christian Borntraeger, 2020/03/06
[PATCH v6 06/18] s390x: protvirt: Inhibit balloon when switching to protected mode, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/04
[PATCH v6 07/18] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/04
[PATCH v6 05/18] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/04