[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility
From: |
David Hildenbrand |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:51:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 |
On 04.03.20 12:42, Janosch Frank wrote:
> When a guest has saved a ipib of type 5 and calls diagnose308 with
s/a/an/
> subcode 10, we have to setup the protected processing environment via
> Ultravisor calls. The calls are done by KVM and are exposed via an
> API.
>
> The following steps are necessary:
> 1. Enable protected mode for the VM (register it and its cpus with the
> Ultravisor)
> 2. Forward the secure header to the Ultravisor (has all information on
> how to decrypt the image and VM information)
> 3. Protect image pages from the host and decrypt them
> 4. Verify the image integrity
>
> Only after step 4 a protected VM is allowed to run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden> [Changes
> to machine]
> ---
> hw/s390x/Makefile.objs | 1 +
> hw/s390x/ipl.c | 33 +++++++++
> hw/s390x/ipl.h | 2 +
> hw/s390x/pv.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/s390x/pv.h | 34 +++++++++
> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h | 1 +
> target/s390x/cpu.c | 4 ++
> target/s390x/cpu.h | 1 +
> target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h | 1 +
> 10 files changed, 274 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 hw/s390x/pv.c
> create mode 100644 hw/s390x/pv.h
[...]
>
> #define KERN_IMAGE_START 0x010000UL
> #define LINUX_MAGIC_ADDR 0x010008UL
> @@ -676,6 +677,38 @@ static void s390_ipl_prepare_qipl(S390CPU *cpu)
> cpu_physical_memory_unmap(addr, len, 1, len);
> }
>
> +int s390_ipl_prepare_pv_header(void)
> +{
> + S390IPLState *ipl = get_ipl_device();
> + IPLBlockPV *ipib_pv = &ipl->iplb_pv.pv;
> + void *hdr = g_malloc(ipib_pv->pv_header_len);
> + int rc;
> +
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(ipib_pv->pv_header_addr, hdr,
> + ipib_pv->pv_header_len);
> + rc = s390_pv_set_sec_parms((uint64_t)hdr,
> + ipib_pv->pv_header_len);
> + g_free(hdr);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +int s390_ipl_pv_unpack(void)
> +{
> + int i, rc = 0;
> + S390IPLState *ipl = get_ipl_device();
> + IPLBlockPV *ipib_pv = &ipl->iplb_pv.pv;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ipib_pv->num_comp; i++) {
> + rc = s390_pv_unpack(ipib_pv->components[i].addr,
> + TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(ipib_pv->components[i].size),
> + ipib_pv->components[i].tweak_pref);
> + if (rc) {
> + break;
> + }
You can check for " && !rc" in the loop condition
> + }
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> void s390_ipl_prepare_cpu(S390CPU *cpu)
> {
> S390IPLState *ipl = get_ipl_device();
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.h b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
> index 04be63cee1..ad8090a02c 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/ipl.h
> +++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
> @@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ typedef union IplParameterBlock IplParameterBlock;
> int s390_ipl_set_loadparm(uint8_t *loadparm);
> int s390_ipl_pv_check_components(IplParameterBlock *iplb);
> void s390_ipl_update_diag308(IplParameterBlock *iplb);
> +int s390_ipl_prepare_pv_header(void);
> +int s390_ipl_pv_unpack(void);
> void s390_ipl_prepare_cpu(S390CPU *cpu);
> IplParameterBlock *s390_ipl_get_iplb(void);
> IplParameterBlock *s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure(void);
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/pv.c b/hw/s390x/pv.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..50b68b6c34
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/s390x/pv.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
> +/*
> + * Secure execution functions
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2020
> + * Author(s):
> + * Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at
> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
> + * directory.
> + */
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
> +
> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
> +#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
> +#include "pv.h"
> +
> +const char *cmd_names[] = {
> + "VM_ENABLE",
> + "VM_DISABLE",
> + "VM_SET_SEC_PARAMS",
> + "VM_UNPACK",
> + "VM_VERIFY",
> + "VM_PREP_RESET",
> + "VM_UNSHARE_ALL",
> + NULL
Is the NULL really needed? This will be somewhat error prone when we add
new PV commands. Not sure if guarding this by an access function (chack
against ARRAY_SIZE() makes sense).
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index a89cf4c129..dd39890f89 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
> #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
> #include "hw/s390x/tod.h"
> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> +#include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
>
> S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
> {
> @@ -238,9 +240,11 @@ static void s390_create_sclpconsole(const char *type,
> Chardev *chardev)
> static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine)
> {
> int ret;
> + S390CcwMachineState *ms = S390_CCW_MACHINE(machine);
> VirtualCssBus *css_bus;
> DeviceState *dev;
>
> + ms->pv = false;
Should not be necessary, default is false.
> s390_sclp_init();
> /* init memory + setup max page size. Required for the CPU model */
> s390_memory_init(machine->ram);
> @@ -316,10 +320,75 @@ static inline void s390_do_cpu_ipl(CPUState *cs,
> run_on_cpu_data arg)
> s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
> }
>
> +static void s390_machine_unprotect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
> +{
> + CPUState *t;
> +
> + if (!ms->pv)
> + return;
How can this ever happen? g_assert(ms->pv) ?
Also, i don't see this function getting called from anywhere else except
when s390_machine_protect() fails. That looks wrong. This has to be
called when going out of PV mode.
> + s390_pv_vm_disable();
> + CPU_FOREACH(t) {
> + S390_CPU(t)->env.pv = false;
> + }
> + ms->pv = false;
> +}
> +
> +static int s390_machine_protect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
> +{
> + CPUState *t;
> + int rc;
> +
g_assert(!ms->pv) ?
> + /* Create SE VM */
> + rc = s390_pv_vm_enable();
> + if (rc) {
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + CPU_FOREACH(t) {
> + S390_CPU(t)->env.pv = true;
> + }
> + ms->pv = true;
> +
> + /* Set SE header and unpack */
> + rc = s390_ipl_prepare_pv_header();
> + if (rc) {
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> +
> + /* Decrypt image */
> + rc = s390_ipl_pv_unpack();
> + if (rc) {
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> +
> + /* Verify integrity */
> + rc = s390_pv_verify();
> + if (rc) {
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> + return rc;
> +
> +out_err:
> + s390_machine_unprotect(ms);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +#define DIAG_308_RC_INVAL_FOR_PV 0x0a02
> +static void s390_machine_inject_pv_error(CPUState *cs)
> +{
> + int r1 = (cs->kvm_run->s390_sieic.ipa & 0x00f0) >> 4;
> + CPUS390XState *env = &S390_CPU(cs)->env;
> +
> + /* Report that we are unable to enter protected mode */
> + env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVAL_FOR_PV;
> +}
> +
[...]
> switch (reset_type) {
> case S390_RESET_EXTERNAL:
> case S390_RESET_REIPL:
> @@ -353,6 +424,26 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
> }
> subsystem_reset();
> run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_initial_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
> + run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_load_normal, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
This does look unrelated and wrong?
> + break;
> + case S390_RESET_PV: /* Subcode 10 */
> + subsystem_reset();
> + s390_crypto_reset();
> +
> + CPU_FOREACH(t) {
> + if (t == cs) {
> + continue;
> + }
> + run_on_cpu(t, s390_do_cpu_full_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
> + }
> + run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
> +
> + if (s390_machine_protect(ms)) {
> + s390_machine_inject_pv_error(cs);
Ah, so it's not an actual exception. BUT: All other guest cpus were
reset, can the guest deal with that?
(run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL) should go after the
s390_machine_protect() I assume - the change you had in the other patch)
> + s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_load_normal, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
> break;
> default:
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
- Re: [PATCH v6 02/18] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10, (continued)
- [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/04
- Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility,
David Hildenbrand <=
- Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/05
- Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility, David Hildenbrand, 2020/03/05
- Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/05
- Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility, David Hildenbrand, 2020/03/05
- Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/05
Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility, David Hildenbrand, 2020/03/05
Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility, Christian Borntraeger, 2020/03/06
[PATCH v6 06/18] s390x: protvirt: Inhibit balloon when switching to protected mode, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/04